Matter Number Parties Charges Decision Key Words
AT 16-40 Andrew Prentice v Football NSW

Severity (Section 9.3(e) of the FNSW Regulations)

Appeal upheld

AT 16-36 Ku-ring-gai District Football Referees Association v Northern Suburbs Football Association

1. The decision was one that was not reasonably open to, relevantly, a MAC having regard to evidence before the MAC (Section 9.3(d) of the FNSW Regulations)

2. Leniency (section 9.3(f) of the FNSW Regulations)

Upholds the Appeal by the KDFRA from each of the determination of NSFAAB

AT 16-35 Yianni Fragogiannis – Sydney United 58 FC

1. The decision was one that was not reasonably open to the DC having regard to the evidence before it (Section 9.3(d) of the FNSW Regulations)

2. Severity (Section 9.3(e) of the FNSW Regulations)

Appeal dismissed

(Decision of the DC of 10 August 2016, being a suspension of 3 fixtures, is confirmed)

AT 16-33 Albury Wodonga FA v Wangaratta City FC

Decision not reasonable open to a Body having regards to the evidence before the Body, Party not afforded a reasonable opportunity to present its case (Sections 9.3(a) and (d) Football NSW Disciplinary Regulations)

Appeal allowed

AT 16-31 Wollongong United FC v FSC

Decision not reasonable open to a Body having regards to the evidence before the Body, Severity (Section 9.3(d), (e)(v) Football NSW Disciplinary Regulations)

Appeal Upheld

Penalty imposed was excessive

AT 16-21 FNSW v Juan Arevalo; Maurice Arevalo

Party not afforded a reasonable opportunity to present its case (Section 9.2(a) Football NSW Disciplinary Regulations)

Appeal Upheld (Remitted to the GPT for rehearing)

AT 16-15 George Lundy; Stan Stamatellis; Steve Lawrence v ESFA

1. They were afforded a reasonable opportunity to present their case;

2. Lack of jurisdiction for both the Judiciary Committee and the Appeal Panel to hear and determine matters for an on behalf of ESFA;

3. The determination of the ESFA Judiciary Committee was affected by actual bias;

4. The determination was not reasonably open to the Judiciary Committee and the Appeal Panel;

5. Severity.

(Sections 9.3 (a)-(e)(i)-(ii) Football NSW Grievance and Disciplinary Regulations)

1. Upheld in regard to Mr Lundy and Mr Stamatellis

2. Rejected in regard to Mr Lawrence

Search Again

FOOTBALL NSW ASSOCIATIONS